I have been researching and studying ancient history, structures, geologic sites, extraterrestrial interventions, myths, legends and folk lore for more then half a century.  In all of this  research I have discovered a theme that seems to be used religiously by present day archaeologists and other people who claim to study similar areas of and subjects of  history and pre-history as I do…  simply stated, there is a genuine lack of intelligence or possible loss of brain matter going on in this end of science.    One only has to read a few articles to discover that the mainstream Archaeologists stop thinking at a date around 3500BC.   Anything they discover there after reverts back to the date of 3500BC…  much like a broken link in intelligence.    It is important to remember that the dates and values assigned to all of the discovered ancient sites and structures are all coming from “Learned and Degreed people” who ought to know better and are certainly, one would hope, able to think outside the box.

It turns out that few of these “Learned people” have the integrity or the morality to “go against the system”…  And just for your understanding the “system” I am referring to is the present combination of opinion emanating mostly from the established (entrenched) governments and main church’s that exist at this present moment.   There is a very old axiom worth repeating here:   “History is always written (re-written) by the conquerers.”   What this really means is that very little of ancient history is known to the average person and only the slightest more knowledge is known to science (scientists) in general unless there has been a specific effort made to look at information outside of the existing references incorporated into the “system”.

If it appears I am being harsh on these people who call themselves scientists, in this case Archaeologists and other researchers of the ancient world, I AM…  truthfully someone needs to take a stick to these lazy and prejudiced people who call themselves researchers of ancient history and archaeologists.  Being popular among your peer group should never be the main concern of anyone in this field, yet all too many times this is exactly what is going on when you see dates that all look the same.

The Earth (planet) has been proven to be more then 5.5 – 6 Billion years old.   There is factual evidence of civilizations that existed 500,000 years ago.  We have discovered cities and technology, machines and artifacts and buried civilizations that exceed modern technology to even date them.  Museums all around the world have basements full of artifacts that cannot be explained using any modern biased thoughts and religious opinions.  The great pyramid (at Cairo) is just one example of an archaeologist who lied about his discovery…  The only “marking” anywhere in or on that pyramid  that identifies it with “Khufu” is a mark put there by Howard Vyse…  in so doing he gave a black eye to himself and to mainstream archeology… a science that should have known better, did know better and does know better but has done nothing to correct itself.

In my opinion there is nothing worse than an intelligent person who acts stupid just to fit in to his group of peers.   Unfortunately limiting attitude condoned and displayed by the archaeological sciences is  the bane of mainstream science in most fields.   Science is attempting to act like it is the new god on the streets but it is neither intelligent enough for this action nor is is advanced enough in its technology to play god.

The first thing that must be done to bring this field of science up to date is to let go of all such dates that uphold the false concepts of life in any age be it the church or governments.  History must be allowed to speak for itself without the voices of ignorance and prejudice as a backdrop.

There is no honor in immorality and no honor in perpetrating a long list of lies.  Science is supposed to be the intelligent side of human thinking but when the researchers and scientists choose to lie and uphold ignorant and baseless theories they have  become no less then a sham and a shame upon their profession.   Any archaeologist that does not understand the true age of this planet and the true age of the many civilizations that have preceded this present one is not worth being called a scientist…  indeed go and learn something about life before you pronounce even one more statement about something you neither understand or believe in.